Don't know how else you can read this:

“I voted to allow further debate on the bill," Bond said in a statement. "But if amnesty and other bad provisions remain, I will oppose ending debate or its final passage.”

I call bullshit Senator.  Bond voted for cloture, which is effectively a promised yea vote on the bill. But he won't vote for it again, unless the amnesty provisions are taken out. What else is left Senator? A provision saying "we like cookies, mom, and apple pie"? Why vote for a bill that you say you later intend to vote against? His spokesperson has said that the Senator would like to see debate continue, so that the public can see what a bad bill it is, and that there are two more votes that could effectively kill the bill. Now, maybe I'm slow, but if you think a bill is bad, and you want folks to think it's bad, why not vote against it every chance you get? The spin around this bill is going so fast it makes my head hurt.

One has to wonder what this does to the crap that Capt Hankirk puts out attacking Sen McCaskill for voting for Amnesty (Sen. McCaskill voted against the bill) when his buddy Sen. Bond is the one voting for the bill? Again, as I've said before Republicans are going to try and blame Democrats for this bill, when it's their own leadership pushing it through.